Some people think that too much money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that money is better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that too much money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that money is better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree? There exists a prevailing belief that excessive resources directed towards the protection of wildlife could be better utilized to serve human needs. However, I strongly oppose this notion and aim to expound upon the multifaceted importance of preserving wild animals. One fundamental reason underpinning my disagreement lies in the intricate balance of ecosystems. The conservation of diverse species, often deemed less consequential, contributes substantially to the equilibrium of nature. For instance, the symbiotic relationship between frogs and mosquitoes epitomizes this delicate balance. Frogs, as natural predators of mosquitoes, play a pivotal role in controlling their population. Diverting funds from the protection of these amphibians could precipitate a surge in mosquito numbers. Beyond the annoyance...