Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

 Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.


Do you want to learn to write essays like this? Join our Online IELTS Step-by-step Preparation club.


Sample answer 1:

Many argue that competition in various daily environments is beneficial, while others feel a focus on cooperation would be ideal. In my opinion, although competition can yield transformational results, it is more valuable to embrace cooperation as a guiding principle.

Those who advocate for competition contend that it serves as a powerful motivator. For instance, in educational settings, the desire to outperform peers can lead students to study harder, aiming for better grades and recognition from teachers and family members. Similarly, in the workplace, competition for promotions and higher compensation packages drives individuals to work diligently. However, within the home, competition rarely yields positive outcomes. Family members who constantly vie for admiration and recognition are likely to experience poor mental health due to heightened stress and tension.

Conversely, fostering a cooperative environment offers greater long-term benefits. When individuals collaborate, whether in school, at work, or at home, they are more likely to experience higher levels of motivation and, more crucially, enjoyment. While competition can act as a catalyst for achievement, it rarely engenders the same degree of unifying satisfaction as cooperation does. A standout example is the dynamics within sports teams. Despite being engaged in competitive activities, the most memorable and lasting experiences often stem from moments of camaraderie shared with teammates. This is why many people cite times spent working together towards a common goal as the highlights of their lives.

Moreover, cooperation cultivates an environment of mutual respect and shared success. For instance, in professional settings, teams that prioritize collaborative efforts often outperform those driven by individual competition. This collaborative spirit leads to innovative solutions and a more harmonious workplace culture. Similarly, in academic settings, group projects encourage students to learn from each other, fostering a deeper understanding of the subject matter.

In conclusion, while competition can spur innovation and personal growth, cooperation provides a more sustainable environment of mutual respect and enjoyment. Depending on the situation, it is imperative to prioritize cooperative understanding to achieve the best outcomes for individuals and society as a whole.


Sample answer 2:

The debate between the merits of competition and cooperation in various spheres of life, such as work, education, and daily interactions, is a perennial one. While some assert that competition drives progress and excellence, others champion the virtues of cooperation for fostering harmony and collective achievement. In my opinion, although competition can be a powerful motivator, the benefits of cooperation ultimately outweigh those of relentless rivalry.

Proponents of competition argue that it is an essential catalyst for personal and professional growth. In educational settings, for instance, the competitive spirit can spur students to surpass their limits, striving for academic excellence and recognition. The prospect of accolades and superior grades motivates students to invest considerable effort and time in their studies. Similarly, in the corporate world, competition for promotions and lucrative bonuses often propels employees to enhance their performance, thereby contributing to the overall success of the organization. The tech industry, for example, thrives on this competitive ethos, where innovation and advancement are driven by a desire to outdo rivals. However, the drawbacks of competition cannot be overlooked. Excessive competition can engender stress, anxiety, and a toxic environment, both in educational institutions and workplaces. Students and employees who constantly feel the pressure to outperform others may suffer from burnout and mental health issues. Additionally, in family settings, a competitive atmosphere can erode familial bonds and foster resentment among members, undermining the nurturing and supportive environment that is essential for personal well-being.

On the other hand, cooperation is lauded for its ability to cultivate a sense of community and mutual support. When individuals collaborate, they pool their diverse skills and perspectives, leading to more innovative and well-rounded solutions. In academic contexts, group projects encourage students to learn from one another, fostering a deeper understanding and retention of knowledge. At work, team-based approaches can enhance productivity and job satisfaction, as employees feel valued and part of a collective effort. Moreover, in daily life, cooperative interactions promote empathy, understanding, and social cohesion, which are vital for a harmonious society. A quintessential example of the power of cooperation can be observed in successful sports teams. While the players are undoubtedly engaged in competition, their triumphs are often attributed to their ability to work cohesively towards a common goal. The camaraderie and shared experiences within the team not only lead to success on the field but also create lasting, positive memories.

In conclusion, while competition can drive individuals to achieve remarkable feats, its benefits are often outweighed by the negative consequences of stress and division. Cooperation, in contrast, fosters a supportive and harmonious environment, enhancing both individual and collective well-being. Therefore, it is imperative to strike a balance, recognizing the value of competition while prioritizing cooperation to build a more inclusive and empathetic society.

Комментарии

Популярные сообщения из этого блога

In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. To what extent do the advantages of having an ageing population outweigh the disadvantages?

IELTS Cambridge Book 18. Test 1. The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020, with predictions for 2030 and 2040.

IELTS Speaking part 3. Changes